mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/website.git
synced 2026-01-26 19:12:15 +00:00
Merge pull request #535 from mloskot/ml/clarify-review-manager-acceptance
Add clarification on acceptance of review manager by library submitter
This commit is contained in:
@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
|
||||
active boost member not connected with the library submission
|
||||
must volunteer to be the "Review Manager" for the library.
|
||||
Members may contact a library author on- or off-list to express
|
||||
interest in managing the review.</p>
|
||||
interest in managing the review. The library author has to accept
|
||||
a person as a review manager.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>The Review Manager:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -271,7 +272,11 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
|
||||
<p>See <a href="/development/submissions.html">Submission
|
||||
Process</a> for a description of the steps a library developer
|
||||
goes through to get a library accepted by Boost.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>First, the library author should accept a review manager.
|
||||
If they feel, for whatever reason, a candidate for a review manager
|
||||
is not competent or fair, they should not accept such candidate.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>A proposed library should remain stable during the review
|
||||
period; it will just confuse and irritate reviewers if there
|
||||
are numerous changes. It is, however, useful to upload fixes
|
||||
@@ -322,9 +327,10 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
|
||||
<li>When a formal review is requested for a library:
|
||||
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li>Approve the review manager based on their
|
||||
participation in the Boost community, including the
|
||||
mailing list, previous reviews, and other forums.</li>
|
||||
<li>Approve the review manager based on initial acceptance
|
||||
by the library submitter, their participation in the Boost
|
||||
community, including the mailing list, previous reviews,
|
||||
and other forums.</li>
|
||||
|
||||
<li>Suggest a schedule, after checking (via private
|
||||
email) availability of the review manager and library
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user