2
0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/website.git synced 2026-01-26 19:12:15 +00:00

Merge pull request #535 from mloskot/ml/clarify-review-manager-acceptance

Add clarification on acceptance of review manager by library submitter
This commit is contained in:
Glen Fernandes
2020-08-23 08:59:50 -04:00
committed by GitHub

View File

@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
active boost member not connected with the library submission
must volunteer to be the "Review Manager" for the library.
Members may contact a library author on- or off-list to express
interest in managing the review.</p>
interest in managing the review. The library author has to accept
a person as a review manager.</p>
<p>The Review Manager:</p>
@@ -271,7 +272,11 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
<p>See <a href="/development/submissions.html">Submission
Process</a> for a description of the steps a library developer
goes through to get a library accepted by Boost.</p>
<p>First, the library author should accept a review manager.
If they feel, for whatever reason, a candidate for a review manager
is not competent or fair, they should not accept such candidate.</p>
<p>A proposed library should remain stable during the review
period; it will just confuse and irritate reviewers if there
are numerous changes. It is, however, useful to upload fixes
@@ -322,9 +327,10 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
<li>When a formal review is requested for a library:
<ul>
<li>Approve the review manager based on their
participation in the Boost community, including the
mailing list, previous reviews, and other forums.</li>
<li>Approve the review manager based on initial acceptance
by the library submitter, their participation in the Boost
community, including the mailing list, previous reviews,
and other forums.</li>
<li>Suggest a schedule, after checking (via private
email) availability of the review manager and library