From 718d86c29e01bfdcdc8fe8f2f9138a89e1505cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Mateusz=20=C5=81oskot?= Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 12:19:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add clarification on acceptance of review manager by library submitter Based on @glenfe's clarification https://github.com/boostorg/website/pull/534#issuecomment-678422348 I received as answer to my question https://github.com/boostorg/website/pull/534#issuecomment-678415872 --- community/reviews.html | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/community/reviews.html b/community/reviews.html index 2dff4491..7595ea90 100644 --- a/community/reviews.html +++ b/community/reviews.html @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html active boost member not connected with the library submission must volunteer to be the "Review Manager" for the library. Members may contact a library author on- or off-list to express - interest in managing the review.

+ interest in managing the review. The library author has to accept + a person as a review manager.

The Review Manager:

@@ -271,7 +272,11 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html

See Submission Process for a description of the steps a library developer goes through to get a library accepted by Boost.

- + +

First, the library author should accept a review manager. + If they feel, for whatever reason, a candidate for a review manager + is not competent or fair, they should not accept such candidate.

+

A proposed library should remain stable during the review period; it will just confuse and irritate reviewers if there are numerous changes. It is, however, useful to upload fixes @@ -322,9 +327,10 @@ https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html

  • When a formal review is requested for a library: