2
0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/python.git synced 2026-01-27 19:12:16 +00:00

Bump to v1.6.0

[SVN r18021]
This commit is contained in:
Joel de Guzman
2003-03-19 23:33:19 +00:00
parent 4ba7b8a8ff
commit 936c1118bd

View File

@@ -1330,6 +1330,258 @@ create a new scope around a class:
.value("blue", blue)
;
[def Py_Initialize [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/initialization.html#l2h-652 Py_Initialize]]
[def Py_Finalize [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/initialization.html#l2h-656 Py_Finalize]]
[def PyRun_String [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/veryhigh.html#l2h-55 PyRun_String]]
[def PyRun_File [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/veryhigh.html#l2h-56 PyRun_File]]
[def Py_eval_input [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/veryhigh.html#l2h-58 Py_eval_input]]
[def Py_file_input [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/veryhigh.html#l2h-59 Py_file_input]]
[def Py_single_input [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/veryhigh.html#l2h-60 Py_single_input]]
[def Py_XINCREF [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/countingRefs.html#l2h-65 Py_XINCREF]]
[def Py_XDECREF [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/countingRefs.html#l2h-67 Py_XDECREF]]
[def PyImport_AppendInittab [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/importing.html#l2h-137 PyImport_AppendInittab]]
[def PyImport_AddModule [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/importing.html#l2h-125 PyImport_AddModule]]
[def PyModule_New [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/moduleObjects.html#l2h-591 PyModule_New]]
[def PyModule_GetDict [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/moduleObjects.html#l2h-594 PyModule_GetDict]]
[page:0 Embedding]
By now you should know how to use Boost.Python to call your C++ code from
Python. However, sometimes you may need to do the reverse: call Python code
from the C++-side. This requires you to ['embed] the Python interpreter
into your C++ program.
Currently, Boost.Python does not directly support everything you'll need
when embedding. Therefore you'll need to use the
[@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/api.html Python/C API] to fill in
the gaps. However, Boost.Python already makes embedding a lot easier and,
in a future version, it may become unnecessary to touch the Python/C API at
all. So stay tuned... :-)
[h2 Building embedded programs]
To be able to use embedding in your programs, they have to be linked to
both Boost.Python's and Python's static link library.
Boost.Python's static link library comes in two variants. Both are located
in Boost's [^/libs/python/build/bin-stage] subdirectory. On Windows, the
variants are called [^boost_python.lib] (for release builds) and
[^boost_python_debug.lib] (for debugging). If you can't find the libraries,
you probably haven't built Boost.Python yet. See [@../../building.html
Building and Testing] on how to do this.
Python's static link library can be found in the [^/libs] subdirectory of
your Python directory. On Windows it is called pythonXY.lib where X.Y is
your major Python version number.
Additionally, Python's [^/include] subdirectory has to be added to your
include path.
In a Jamfile, all the above boils down to:
[pre
projectroot c:\projects\embedded_program ; # location of the program
# bring in the rules for python
SEARCH on python.jam = $(BOOST_BUILD_PATH) ;
include python.jam ;
exe embedded_program # name of the executable
: #sources
embedded_program.cpp
: # requirements
<find-library>boost_python <library-path>c:\boost\libs\python
$(PYTHON_PROPERTIES)
<library-path>$(PYTHON_LIB_PATH)
<find-library>$(PYTHON_EMBEDDED_LIBRARY) ;
]
[h2 Getting started]
Being able to build is nice, but there is nothing to build yet. Embedding
the Python interpreter into one of your C++ programs requires these 4
steps:
# '''#include''' [^<boost/python.hpp>][br][br]
# Call Py_Initialize() to start the interpreter and create the [^__main__] module.[br][br]
# Call other Python C API routines to use the interpreter.[br][br]
# Call Py_Finalize() to stop the interpreter and release its resources.
(Of course, there can be other C++ code between all of these steps.)
[:['[*Now that we can embed the interpreter in our programs, lets see how to put it to use...]]]
[page:1 Using the interpreter]
As you probably already know, objects in Python are reference-counted.
Naturally, the [^PyObject]s of the Python/C API are also reference-counted.
There is a difference however. While the reference-counting is fully
automatic in Python, the Python/C API requires you to do it
[@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/refcounts.html by hand]. This is
messy and especially hard to get right in the presence of C++ exceptions.
Fortunately Boost.Python provides the [@../../v2/handle.html handle] class
template to automate the process.
[h2 Reference-counting handles]
There are two ways in which a function in the Python/C API can return a
[^PyObject*]: as a ['borrowed reference] or as a ['new reference]. Which of
these a function uses, is listed in that function's documentation. The two
require slightely different approaches to reference-counting but both can
be 'handled' by Boost.Python.
For a function returning a ['borrowed reference] we'll have to tell the
[^handle] that the [^PyObject*] is borrowed with the aptly named
[@../../v2/handle.html#borrowed-spec borrowed] function. Two functions
returning borrowed references are PyImport_AddModule and PyModule_GetDict.
The former returns a reference to an already imported module, the latter
retrieves a module's namespace dictionary. Let's use them to retrieve the
namespace of the [^__main__] module:
handle<> main_module(borrowed( PyImport_AddModule("__main__") ));
handle<> main_namespace(borrowed( PyModule_GetDict(main_module.get()) ));
Because the Python/C API doesn't know anything about [^handle]s, we used
the [@../../v2/handle.html#handle-spec-observers get] member function to
retrieve the [^PyObject*] from which the [^handle] was constructed.
For a function returning a ['new reference] we can just create a [^handle]
out of the raw [^PyObject*] without wrapping it in a call to borrowed. One
such function that returns a new reference is PyRun_String which we'll
discuss in the next section.
[blurb __detail__ [*Handle is a class ['template], so why haven't we been using any template parameters?][br]
[br]
[^handle] has a single template parameter specifying the type of the managed object. This type is [^PyObject] 99% of the time, so the parameter was defaulted to [^PyObject] for convenience. Therefore we can use the shorthand [^handle<>] instead of the longer, but equivalent, [^handle<PyObject>].
]
[h2 Running Python code]
To run Python code from C++ there is a family of functions in the API
starting with the PyRun prefix. You can find the full list of these
functions [@http://www.python.org/doc/current/api/veryhigh.html here]. They
all work similarly so we will look at only one of them, namely:
PyObject* PyRun_String(char *str, int start, PyObject *globals, PyObject *locals)
PyRun_String takes the code to execute as a null-terminated (C-style)
string in its [^str] parameter. The function returns a new reference to a
Python object. Which object is returned depends on the [^start] paramater.
The [^start] parameter is the start symbol from the Python grammar to use
for interpreting the code. The possible values are:
[table Start symbols
[Py_eval_input] [for interpreting isolated expressions]
[Py_file_input] [for interpreting sequences of statements]
[Py_single_input] [for interpreting a single statement]
]
When using Py_eval_input, the input string must contain a single expression
and its result is returned. When using Py_file_input, the string can
contain an abitrary number of statements and None is returned.
Py_single_input works in the same way as Py_file_input but only accepts a
single statement.
Lastly, the [^globals] and [^locals] parameters are Python dictionaries
containing the globals and locals of the context in which to run the code.
For most intents and purposes you can use the namespace dictionary of the
[^__main__] module for both parameters.
We have already seen how to get the [^__main__] module's namespace so let's
run some Python code in it:
handle<> main_module(borrowed( PyImport_AddModule("__main__") ));
handle<> main_namespace(borrowed( PyModule_GetDict(main_module.get()) ));
handle<>( PyRun_String("hello = file('hello.txt', 'w')\n"
"hello.write('Hello world!')\n"
"hello.close()", Py_file_input,
main_namespace.get(), main_namespace.get()) );
This should create a file called 'hello.txt' in the current directory
containing a phrase that is well-known in programming circles.
__note__ [*Note] that we wrap the return value of PyRun_String in a
(nameless) [^handle] even though we are not interested in it. If we didn't
do this, the the returned object would be kept alive unnecessarily. Unless
you want to be a Dr. Frankenstein, always wrap [^PyObject*]s in [^handle]s.
[h2 Beyond handles]
It's nice that [^handle] manages the reference counting details for us, but
other than that it doesn't do much. Often we'd like to have a more useful
class to manipulate Python objects. But we have already seen such a class
in the [@object_interface.html previous section]: the aptly named [^object]
class and it's derivatives. What we haven't seen, is that they can be
constructed from a [^handle]. The following examples should illustrate this
fact:
handle<> main_module(borrowed( PyImport_AddModule("__main__") ));
main_namespace dict(handle<>(borrowed( PyModule_GetDict(main_module.get()) )));
handle<>( PyRun_String("result = 5 ** 2", Py_file_input,
main_namespace.ptr(), main_namespace.ptr()) );
int five_squared = extract<int>( main_namespace["result"] );
Here we create a dictionary object for the [^__main__] module's namespace.
Then we assign 5 squared to the result variable and read this variable from
the dictionary. Another way to achieve the same result is to let
PyRun_String return the result directly with Py_eval_input:
object result(handle<>( PyRun_String("5 ** 2", Py_eval_input,
main_namespace.ptr(), main_namespace.ptr()) ));
int five_squared = extract<int>(result);
__note__ [*Note] that [^object]'s member function to return the wrapped
[^PyObject*] is called [^ptr] instead of [^get]. This makes sense if you
take into account the different functions that [^object] and [^handle]
perform.
[h2 Exception handling]
If an exception occurs in the execution of some Python code, the PyRun_String function returns a null pointer. Constructing a [^handle] out of this null pointer throws [@../../v2/errors.html#error_already_set-spec error_already_set], so basically, the Python exception is automatically translated into a C++ exception when using [^handle]:
try
{
object result(handle<>( PyRun_String("5/0", Py_eval_input,
main_namespace.ptr(), main_namespace.ptr()) ));
// execution will never get here:
int five_divided_by_zero = extract<int>(result);
}
catch(error_already_set)
{
// handle the exception in some way
}
The [^error_already_set] exception class doesn't carry any information in itself. To find out more about the Python exception that occurred, you need to use the [@http://www.python.org/doc/api/exceptionHandling.html exception handling functions] of the Python/C API in your catch-statement. This can be as simple as calling [@http://www.python.org/doc/api/exceptionHandling.html#l2h-70 PyErr_Print()] to print the exception's traceback to the console, or comparing the type of the exception with those of the [@http://www.python.org/doc/api/standardExceptions.html standard exceptions]:
catch(error_already_set)
{
if (PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_ZeroDivisionError))
{
// handle ZeroDivisionError specially
}
else
{
// print all other errors to stderr
PyErr_Print();
}
}
(To retrieve even more information from the exception you can use some of the other exception handling functions listed [@http://www.python.org/doc/api/exceptionHandling.html here].)
If you'd rather not have [^handle] throw a C++ exception when it is constructed, you can use the [@../../v2/handle.html#allow_null-spec allow_null] function in the same way you'd use borrowed:
handle<> result(allow_null( PyRun_String("5/0", Py_eval_input,
main_namespace.ptr(), main_namespace.ptr()) ));
if (!result)
// Python exception occurred
else
// everything went okay, it's safe to use the result
[page Iterators]
In C++, and STL in particular, we see iterators everywhere. Python also has