doc changes

[SVN r33953]
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Wallin
2006-05-07 10:58:37 +00:00
committed by Peter Dimov
parent 2f96a1bbfa
commit 99c316c690

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ __ ../../../../index.htm
Introduction
------------
``boost/parameter/python.hpp`` introduces a group of **def_visitors** that can
``boost/parameter/python.hpp`` introduces a group of def_visitors_ that can
be used to easily expose Boost.Parameter-enabled member functions to Python with
Boost.Python. It also provides a function template ``def()`` that can be used
to expose Boost.Parameter-enabled free functions.
@@ -47,25 +47,42 @@ to expose Boost.Parameter-enabled free functions.
.. Need a link from "def_visitors" to the place in Python docs
.. where that's defined.
.. _def_visitors: ../../../python/doc/v2/def_visitor.html
To bind a Boost.Parameter enabled function the keyword tags must be specified.
Additionally, because Boost.Parameter enabled functions are templates, the
desired function signature must be specified.
The keyword tags are specified using the syntax described in |KeywordsSpec| below,
and the signature as an MPL sequence of parameter types. Additional data may be
needed in the signature sequence by specific binding utilities. For example,
``function`` requires the return type to be part of the signature sequence.
concept |KeywordsSpec|
----------------------
A |KeywordsSpec| is an MPL sequence where each element is either:
* A *required* keyword tag of the form ``K``
* **or**, an *optional* keyword tag of the form ``K*``
* **or**, a *special* keyword tag of the formn ``K**``
* A *required* keyword of the form ``K``
* **or**, an *optional* keyword of the form ``K*``
* **or**, a *special* keyword of the form ``K**``
where ``K`` is a `keyword tag type`_.
.. _keyword tag type: reference.html#terminology
.. here you have to say, "where K is..."
.. #
The **arity range** of a |KeywordsSpec| is determined by:
The **arity range** of a |KeywordsSpec| is defined as:
.. parsed-literal::
[ mpl::size<S> - number of *special* keyword tags in ``S`` , mpl::size<S> ]
For example, the **arity range** of ``mpl::vector2<x,y>`` is 2, the **arity range** of
``mpl::vector2<x,y*>`` is 2 and the **arity range** of ``mpl::vector2<x,y**>`` is 1.
For example, the **arity range** of ``mpl::vector2<x,y>`` is [2,2], the **arity range** of
``mpl::vector2<x,y*>`` is [2,2] and the **arity range** of ``mpl::vector2<x,y**>`` is [1,2].
.. It makes no sense to say that the "range" of something is x,
.. where x is just a number. A range goes from x to y. I don't
@@ -74,82 +91,123 @@ For example, the **arity range** of ``mpl::vector2<x,y>`` is 2, the **arity rang
.. results above. I'd have guessed that the arity range of
.. vector2<x,y**> was [1,2] ... which makes some sense.
.. #
*special* keyword tags
---------------------------------
If the default type for an argument is not convertible to the argument type, as
specified to the binding functions below, that argument must be specified as a
*special* argument.
.. This whole thing comes out of order. You need to explain that
.. to bind pararameter-endabled functions to python you need to
.. specify an parameter type (not an argument type), and that an
.. optional argument has to have a default value _and_ type.
.. I think. If that's not the right explanation, you need to say
.. something that sets up similar context.
In the example below the default type for argument ``y`` is ``char const[5]``, but
the argument type is ``int``. Therefore ``y`` must be specified as a *special*
argument in the |KeywordsSpec|.
.. The example below doesn't make any sense to me. Where does char
.. const[5] come from? Why would I choose a different argument
.. type from a default type. What is the effect on the resulting
.. Python interface?
Doing this will generate N^2 overloads, where N is the number of *special* arguments.
In this case two overloads will be generated, one with ``y`` included and one without.
Having many *special* keywords will result in lots of overloads, and stress the
compiler.
.. using "this" without an antecedent above. What are we "doing?"
.. Don't you mean 2^N?
Note that this makes the *arity range* ``[1,2]``, so we'll need two forwarding overloads.
Sometimes it is desirable to have a default value for a parameter that differ
in type from the parameter. This technique is useful for doing simple tag-dispatching
based on the presence of a parameter. An example_ of this is given in the Boost.Parameter
docs. The example uses a different technique, but could also have been written like this:
.. parsed-literal::
BOOST_PARAMETER_FUNCTION((void), f, tag,
(required (x, \*))
(optional (y, \*))
)
{
std::cout << args[x] << args[y | "none"] << "\n";
}
template <class ArgumentPack>
void dfs_dispatch(ArgumentPack& args, mpl::false\_)
{
*…compute and use default color map…*
}
template <class ArgumentPack, class ColorMap>
void dfs_dispatch(ArgumentPack& args, ColorMap colormap)
{
*…use colormap…*
}
template <class ArgumentPack>
void depth_first_search(ArgumentPack& args)
{
core::dfs_dispatch(args, args[color | mpl::false_());
}
struct f_fwd
{
template <class A0, class A1>
void operator()(boost::type<void>, A0 const& a0)
.. _example: index.html#dispatching-based-on-the-presence-of-a-default
In the above example the type of the default for ``color`` is ``mpl::false_``, a
type that is distinct from any color map that the user might supply.
When binding the case outlined above, the default type for ``color`` will not
be convertible to the parameter type. Therefore we need to tag the ``color``
keyword as a *special* keyword. By doing this we tell the binding functions
that it needs to generate two overloads, one with the ``color`` parameter
present and one without. If we would have had two *special* keywords, four
overloads would need to be generated. The number of generated overloads is
equal to ``2^N``, where ``N`` is the number of *special* keywords.
.. If the default type for an argument is not convertible to the argument type, as
specified to the binding functions below, that argument must be specified as a
*special* argument.
.. This whole thing comes out of order. You need to explain that
.. to bind pararameter-endabled functions to python you need to
.. specify an parameter type (not an argument type), and that an
.. optional argument has to have a default value _and_ type.
.. I think. If that's not the right explanation, you need to say
.. something that sets up similar context.
In the example below the default type for argument ``y`` is ``char const[5]``, but
the argument type is ``int``. Therefore ``y`` must be specified as a *special*
argument in the |KeywordsSpec|.
.. The example below doesn't make any sense to me. Where does char
.. const[5] come from? Why would I choose a different argument
.. type from a default type. What is the effect on the resulting
.. Python interface?
Doing this will generate ``2^N`` overloads, where ``N`` is the number of *special* parameters.
In this case two overloads will be generated, one with ``y`` included and one without.
Having many *special* keywords will result in lots of overloads, and stress the
compiler.
.. using "this" without an antecedent above. What are we "doing?"
.. Don't you mean 2^N?
Note that this makes the *arity range* ``[1,2]``, so we'll need two forwarding overloads.
.. parsed-literal::
BOOST_PARAMETER_FUNCTION((void), f, tag,
(required (x, \*))
(optional (y, \*))
)
{
f(a0);
std::cout << args[x] << args[y | "none"] << "\n";
}
template <class A0, class A1>
void operator()(boost::type<void>, A0 const& a0, A1 const& a1)
struct f_fwd
{
f(a0, a1);
template <class A0, class A1>
void operator()(boost::type<void>, A0 const& a0)
{
f(a0);
}
template <class A0, class A1>
void operator()(boost::type<void>, A0 const& a0, A1 const& a1)
{
f(a0, a1);
}
};
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(..)
{
class_<X>("X")
.def("f",
function<
fwd
, mpl::vector2<tag::x, **tag::y\*\***>
, mpl::vector3<void, int, int>
>()
);
}
};
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(..)
{
class_<X>("X")
.def("f",
function<
fwd
, mpl::vector2<tag::x, **tag::y\*\***>
, mpl::vector3<void, int, int>
>()
);
}
.. You don't explain what those boost::type<void> things are all
.. about.
.. Weren't we going to generate the f_fwd struct ourselves?
.. I don't think this code has been tested. I see the identifier
.. "fwd" above, which surely must be wrong.
.. You don't explain what those boost::type<void> things are all
.. about.
.. Weren't we going to generate the f_fwd struct ourselves?
.. I don't think this code has been tested. I see the identifier
.. "fwd" above, which surely must be wrong.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -171,7 +229,7 @@ Defines a named parameter enabled constructor.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* ``Keywords`` is a model of |KeywordsSpec|.
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword arguments,
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword ,
in the order dictated by ``Keywords``.
* ``Class`` must support these expressions:
@@ -230,7 +288,7 @@ Defines a ``__call__`` operator, mapped to ``operator()`` in C++.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* ``Keywords`` is a model of |KeywordsSpec|.
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword arguments,
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword parameters,
in the order dictated by ``Keywords``, and the return type prepended.
* ``Class`` must support these expressions, where ``c`` is an instance of ``Class``:
@@ -305,7 +363,7 @@ Defines a named parameter enabled member function.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* ``Keywords`` is a model of |KeywordsSpec|.
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword arguments,
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword parameters,
in the order dictated by ``Keywords``, and the return type prepended.
* An instance of ``Fwd`` must support this expression:
@@ -378,7 +436,7 @@ Defines a named parameter enabled free function in the current Python scope.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* ``Keywords`` is a model of |KeywordsSpec|.
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword arguments,
* ``Signature`` is an MPL sequence with the types of the keyword parameters,
in the order dictated by ``Keywords``, and the return type prepended.
* An instance of ``Fwd`` must support this expression: