Release 1.37.0

[SVN r49549]

CMakeLists.txt

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-#----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# This file was automatically generated from the original CMakeLists.txt file
-# Add a variable to hold the headers for the library
-set (lib_headers
-    dynamic_bitset.hpp
-    dynamic_bitset_fwd.hpp
-    dynamic_bitset
-)
-
-# Add a library target to the build system
-boost_library_project(
-  dynamic_bitset
-  #  SRCDIRS 
-  TESTDIRS  test
-  HEADERS ${lib_headers}
-  #  DOCDIRS 
-  DESCRIPTION  "A runtime-sized version of std::bitset"
-  MODULARIZED
-  AUTHORS  "Jeremy Siek <jeremy.siek -at- gmail.com>"
-           "Chuck Allison"
-  #  MAINTAINERS 
-)
-
-

include/boost/dynamic_bitset/config.hpp

@@ -20,13 +20,19 @@
 # define BOOST_OLD_IOSTREAMS
 #endif
 
+// this should be in the config system some day
+// see http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg62291.php
+#define BOOST_DYNAMIC_BITSET_GNUC_VERSION  (  (__GNUC__)       * 100 * 100     \
+                                            + (__GNUC_MINOR__) * 100)
+
 // no-op function to workaround gcc bug c++/8419
 //
 namespace boost { namespace detail {
     template <typename T> T make_non_const(T t) { return t; }
 }}
 
-#if defined(__GNUC__)
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_DYNAMIC_BITSET_GNUC_VERSION, \
+                                          BOOST_TESTED_AT(30300))
 # define BOOST_DYNAMIC_BITSET_WRAP_CONSTANT(expr) \
          (boost::detail::make_non_const(expr))
 #else

include/boost/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp

@@ -476,18 +476,24 @@ BOOST_DYNAMIC_BITSET_PRIVATE:
 
 };
 
-#if !defined BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION
+#if defined(__IBMCPP__) && BOOST_WORKAROUND(__IBMCPP__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(600))
 
-template <typename Block, typename Allocator>
-const typename dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::block_width_type
+// Workaround for IBM's AIX platform.
+// See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.user/15331
+//
+// NOTE:
+//  The compiler is actually right, until core issue 454 will be settled:
+//   <http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#454>
+//
+//  It's arguable whether we want to mark this with BOOST_WORKAROUND or not.
+
+
+template<typename Block, typename Allocator>
+dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::block_width_type const
 dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::bits_per_block;
 
-template <typename Block, typename Allocator>
-const typename dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::size_type
-dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::npos;
-
-template <typename Block, typename Allocator>
-const typename dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::block_width_type
+template<typename Block, typename Allocator>
+dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::block_width_type const
 dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::ulong_width;
 
 #endif

module.cmake

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-boost_module(dynamic_bitset DEPENDS detail static_assert)

test/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-boost_additional_test_dependencies(dynamic_bitset BOOST_DEPENDS test config)
-
-
-boost_test_run(dyn_bitset_unit_tests1 ../dyn_bitset_unit_tests1.cpp)
-boost_test_run(dyn_bitset_unit_tests2 ../dyn_bitset_unit_tests2.cpp)
-boost_test_run(dyn_bitset_unit_tests3 ../dyn_bitset_unit_tests3.cpp)
-boost_test_run(dyn_bitset_unit_tests4 ../dyn_bitset_unit_tests4.cpp)