boost/build
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/build.git synced 2026-02-14 12:42:11 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use the pathf90 compiler for all compilation.

Browse Source 
Patch from Spencer E. Olson. 

Here's the explanation from email:

The version of pathscale that I have access to is 3.2 and there doesn't seem 
to be a pathf77 executable.  The man pages do not reference it, and there is 
also not a -f77 option that specifies that the code is fortran 77.  Rather, 
the man pages indicate that pathscale only recognizes the difference between 
free form and fixed form fortran instead of F77 vs F90 vs F95.  

Does anyone have an available installation that differs from this?  If not, 
I'll submit another small patch for changing this to using pathf90 to compile 
f77 code--I've tested it and it appears to work well enough.  


[SVN r59508]
This commit is contained in:
Vladimir Prus
2010-02-05 11:51:46 +00:00
parent cd17ec86ea
commit bbdb0315fc
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/tools/pathscale.jam
View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ rule init ( version ? : command * : options * )
# fortran support
local f-command = [ common.get-invocation-command pathscale : pathf90 : $(command) ] ;
local command_f = $(command_f[1--2]) $(f-command[-1]:B=pathf77) ;
local command_f = $(command_f[1--2]) $(f-command[-1]:B=pathf90) ;
local command_f90 = $(command_f[1--2]) $(f-command[-1]:B=pathf90) ;
toolset.flags pathscale CONFIG_F_COMMAND $(condition) : $(command_f) ;
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ actions compile.c++
actions compile.fortran
{
"$(CONFIG_F_COMMAND)" -f77 $(OPTIONS) -D$(DEFINES) -I"$(INCLUDES)" -c -o "$(<)" "$(>)"
"$(CONFIG_F_COMMAND)" $(OPTIONS) -D$(DEFINES) -I"$(INCLUDES)" -c -o "$(<)" "$(>)"
}
rule compile.fortran90 ( targets * : sources * : properties * )