mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/atomic.git
synced 2026-02-02 20:32:09 +00:00
Added a comment about the reason why we promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -79,6 +79,14 @@ namespace detail {
|
||||
// to annotate the conditional instructions. These are ignored in other modes (e.g. v6),
|
||||
// so they can always be present.
|
||||
|
||||
// A note about memory_order_consume. Technically, this architecture allows to avoid
|
||||
// unnecessary memory barrier after consume load since it supports data dependency ordering.
|
||||
// However, some compiler optimizations may break a seemingly valid code relying on data
|
||||
// dependency tracking by injecting bogus branches to aid out of order execution.
|
||||
// This may happen not only in Boost.Atomic code but also in user's code, which we have no
|
||||
// control of. See this thread: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2014/06/213890.php.
|
||||
// For this reason we promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire.
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__thumb__) && !defined(__thumb2__)
|
||||
#define BOOST_ATOMIC_DETAIL_ARM_ASM_START(TMPREG) "adr " #TMPREG ", 8f\n" "bx " #TMPREG "\n" ".arm\n" ".align 4\n" "8:\n"
|
||||
#define BOOST_ATOMIC_DETAIL_ARM_ASM_END(TMPREG) "adr " #TMPREG ", 9f + 1\n" "bx " #TMPREG "\n" ".thumb\n" ".align 2\n" "9:\n"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ namespace detail {
|
||||
to pose a problem.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// A note about memory_order_consume. Technically, this architecture allows to avoid
|
||||
// unnecessary memory barrier after consume load since it supports data dependency ordering.
|
||||
// However, some compiler optimizations may break a seemingly valid code relying on data
|
||||
// dependency tracking by injecting bogus branches to aid out of order execution.
|
||||
// This may happen not only in Boost.Atomic code but also in user's code, which we have no
|
||||
// control of. See this thread: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2014/06/213890.php.
|
||||
// For this reason we promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire.
|
||||
|
||||
struct gcc_ppc_operations_base
|
||||
{
|
||||
static BOOST_FORCEINLINE void fence_before(memory_order order) BOOST_NOEXCEPT
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -43,6 +43,14 @@ namespace boost {
|
||||
namespace atomics {
|
||||
namespace detail {
|
||||
|
||||
// A note about memory_order_consume. Technically, this architecture allows to avoid
|
||||
// unnecessary memory barrier after consume load since it supports data dependency ordering.
|
||||
// However, some compiler optimizations may break a seemingly valid code relying on data
|
||||
// dependency tracking by injecting bogus branches to aid out of order execution.
|
||||
// This may happen not only in Boost.Atomic code but also in user's code, which we have no
|
||||
// control of. See this thread: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2014/06/213890.php.
|
||||
// For this reason we promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire.
|
||||
|
||||
struct msvc_arm_operations_base
|
||||
{
|
||||
static BOOST_FORCEINLINE void hardware_full_fence() BOOST_NOEXCEPT
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user