2
0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/website.git synced 2026-01-19 16:52:15 +00:00
Files
website/development/int_const_guidelines.html
2024-09-01 08:56:16 -07:00

408 lines
15 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<title>Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" type="image/ico" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href=
"/style-v2/section-development.css" />
<!--[if IE 7]> <style type="text/css"> body { behavior: url(/style-v2/csshover3.htc); } </style> <![endif]-->
<script defer data-domain="original.boost.org" src="https://plausible.io/js/script.js"></script></head><!--
Note: Editing website content is documented at:
https://www.boost.org/development/website_updating.html
-->
<body>
<div id="heading">
<!--#include virtual="/common/heading.html" -->
</div>
<div id="body">
<div id="body-inner">
<div id="content">
<div class="section" id="intro">
<div class="section-0">
<div class="section-title">
<h1>Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions</h1>
</div>
<div class="section-body">
<p>Integral Constant Expressions are used in many places in
C++; as array bounds, as bit-field lengths, as enumerator
initialisers, and as arguments to non-type template parameters.
However many compilers have problems handling integral constant
expressions; as a result of this, programming using non-type
template parameters in particular can be fraught with
difficulty, often leading to the incorrect assumption that
non-type template parameters are unsupported by a particular
compiler. This short article is designed to provide a set of
guidelines and workarounds that, if followed, will allow
integral constant expressions to be used in a manner portable
to all the compilers currently supported by boost. Although
this article is mainly targeted at boost library authors, it
may also be useful for users who want to understand why boost
code is written in a particular way, or who want to write
portable code themselves.</p>
<h2>What is an Integral Constant Expression?</h2>
<p>Integral constant expressions are described in section 5.19
of the standard, and are sometimes referred to as "compile time
constants". An integral constant expression can be one of the
following:</p>
<ol>
<li>A literal integral value, for example <code>0u</code> or
<code>3L</code>.</li>
<li>An enumerator value.</li>
<li>Global integral constants, for example:
<pre>
const int my_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT = 3;
</pre>
</li>
<li>Static member constants, for example:
<pre>
struct myclass
{ static const int value = 0; };
</pre>
</li>
<li>Member enumerator values, for example:
<pre>
struct myclass
{ enum{ value = 0 }; };
</pre>
</li>
<li>Non-type template parameters of integral or enumerator
type.</li>
<li>The result of a <code>sizeof</code> expression, for
example:
<pre>
sizeof(foo(a, b, c))
</pre>
</li>
<li>The result of a <code>static_cast</code>, where the
target type is an integral or enumerator type, and the
argument is either another integral constant expression, or a
floating-point literal.</li>
<li>The result of applying a binary operator to two integral
constant expressions:
<pre>
INTEGRAL_CONSTANT1 op INTEGRAL_CONSTANT2
</pre>provided that the operator is not an assignment operator, or comma
operator.
</li>
<li>The result of applying a unary operator to an integral
constant expression:
<pre>
op INTEGRAL_CONSTANT1
</pre>provided that the operator is not the increment or decrement operator.
</li>
</ol>
<h2>Coding Guidelines</h2>
<p>The following guidelines are declared in no particular order
(in other words you need to obey all of them - sorry!), and may
also be incomplete, more guidelines may be added as compilers
change and/or more problems are encountered.</p>
<h3>When declaring constants that are class members always use
the macro <code>BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT.</code></h3>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct myclass
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, value = sizeof(T));
};
</pre>
<p>Rationale: not all compilers support inline initialisation
of member constants, others treat member enumerators in strange
ways (they're not always treated as integral constant
expressions). The BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT macro uses the most
appropriate method for the compiler in question.</p>
<h3>Don't declare integral constant expressions whose type is
wider than int.</h3>
<p>Rationale: while in theory all integral types are usable in
integral constant expressions, in practice many compilers limit
integral constant expressions to types no wider than
<code>int</code>.</p>
<h3>Don't use logical operators in integral constant
expressions; use template meta-programming instead.</h3>
<p>The header <code>&lt;boost/type_traits/ice.hpp&gt;</code>
contains a number of workaround templates, that fulfil the role
of logical operators, for example instead of:</p>
<pre>
INTEGRAL_CONSTANT1 || INTEGRAL_CONSTANT2
</pre>
<p>Use:</p>
<pre>
::boost::type_traits::ice_or&lt;INTEGRAL_CONSTANT1,INTEGRAL_CONSTANT2&gt;::value
</pre>
<p>Rationale: A number of compilers (particularly the Borland
and Microsoft compilers), tend to not to recognise integral
constant expressions involving logical operators as genuine
integral constant expressions. The problem generally only shows
up when the integral constant expression is nested deep inside
template code, and is hard to reproduce and diagnose.</p>
<h3>Don't use any operators in an integral constant expression
used as a non-type template parameter</h3>
<p>Rather than:</p>
<pre>
typedef myclass&lt;INTEGRAL_CONSTANT1 ==
INTEGRAL_CONSTANT2&gt; mytypedef;
</pre>
<p>Use:</p>
<pre>
typedef myclass&lt; some_symbol&gt;
mytypedef;
</pre>
<p>Where <code>some_symbol</code> is the symbolic name of a an
integral constant expression whose value is
<code>(INTEGRAL_CONSTANT1 == INTEGRAL_CONSTANT2).</code></p>
<p>Rationale: the older EDG based compilers (some of which are
used in the most recent version of that platform's compiler),
don't recognise expressions containing operators as non-type
template parameters, even though such expressions can be used
as integral constant expressions elsewhere.</p>
<h3>Always use a fully qualified name to refer to an integral
constant expression.</h3>
<p>For example:</p>
<pre>
<code>typedef</code> myclass&lt; ::boost::is_integral&lt;some_type&gt;::value&gt; mytypedef;
</pre>
<p>Rationale: at least one compiler (Borland's), doesn't
recognise the name of a constant as an integral constant
expression unless the name is fully qualified (which is to say
it starts with <code>::</code>).</p>
<h3>Always leave a space after a '<code>&lt;</code>' and before
'<code>::</code>'</h3>
<p>For example:</p>
<pre>
typedef myclass&lt; ::boost::is_integral&lt;some_type&gt;::value&gt; mytypedef;
^
ensure there is space here!
</pre>
<p>Rationale: <code>&lt;:</code> is a legal digraph in it's own
right, so <code>&lt;::</code> is interpreted as the same as
<code>[:</code>.</p>
<h3>Don't use local names as integral constant expressions</h3>
<p>Example:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct foobar
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, temp = computed_value);
typedef myclass&lt;temp&gt; mytypedef; // error
};
</pre>
<p>Rationale: At least one compiler (Borland's) doesn't accept
this.</p>
<p>Although it is possible to fix this by using:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct foobar
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, temp = computed_value);
typedef foobar self_type;
typedef myclass&lt;(self_type::temp)&gt; mytypedef; // OK
};
</pre>
<p>This breaks at least one other compiler (VC6), it is better
to move the integral constant expression computation out into a
separate traits class:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct foobar_helper
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, value = computed_value);
};
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct foobar
{
typedef myclass&lt; ::foobar_helper&lt;T&gt;::value&gt; mytypedef; // OK
};
</pre>
<h3>Don't use dependent default parameters for non-type
template parameters.</h3>
<p>For example:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T, int I = ::boost::is_integral&lt;T&gt;::value&gt; // Error can't deduce value of I in some cases.
struct foobar;
</pre>
<p>Rationale: this kind of usage fails for Borland C++. Note
that this is only an issue where the default value is dependent
upon a previous template parameter, for example the following
is fine:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T, int I = 3&gt; // OK, default value is not dependent
struct foobar;
</pre>
<h2>Unresolved Issues</h2>
<p>The following issues are either unresolved or have fixes
that are compiler specific, and/or break one or more of the
coding guidelines.</p>
<h3>Be careful of numeric_limits</h3>
<p>There are three issues here:</p>
<ol>
<li>The header &lt;limits&gt; may be absent - it is
recommended that you never include &lt;limits&gt; directly
but use &lt;boost/pending/limits.hpp&gt; instead. This header
includes the "real" &lt;limits&gt; header if it is available,
otherwise it supplies it's own std::numeric_limits
definition. Boost also defines the macro BOOST_NO_LIMITS if
&lt;limits&gt; is absent.</li>
<li>The implementation of std::numeric_limits may be defined
in such a way that its static-const members may not be usable
as integral constant expressions. This contradicts the
standard but seems to be a bug that affects at least two
standard library vendors; boost defines
BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS in
&lt;boost/config.hpp&gt; when this is the case.</li>
<li>There is a strange bug in VC6, where the members of
std::numeric_limits can be "prematurely evaluated" in
template code, for example:</li>
</ol>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct limits_test
{
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(::std::numeric_limits&lt;T&gt;::is_specialized);
};
</pre>
<p>This code fails to compile with VC6 even though no instances
of the template are ever created; for some bizarre reason
<code>::std::numeric_limits&lt;T&gt;::is_specialized</code>
always evaluates to false, irrespective of what the template
parameter T is. The problem seems to be confined to expressions
which depend on std::numeric_limts: for example if you replace
<code>::std::numeric_limits&lt;T&gt;::is_specialized</code>
with <code>::boost::is_arithmetic&lt;T&gt;::value</code>, then
everything is fine. The following workaround also works but
conflicts with the coding guidelines:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct limits_test
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, check = ::std::numeric_limits&lt;T&gt;::is_specialized);
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(check);
};
</pre>
<p>So it is probably best to resort to something like this:</p>
<pre>
template &lt;class T&gt;
struct limits_test
{
#ifdef BOOST_MSVC
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, check = ::std::numeric_limits&lt;T&gt;::is_specialized);
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(check);
#else
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(::std::numeric_limits&lt;T&gt;::is_specialized);
#endif
};
</pre>
<h3>Be careful how you use the sizeof operator</h3>
<p>As far as I can tell, all compilers treat sizeof expressions
correctly when the argument is the name of a type (or a
template-id), however problems can occur if:</p>
<ol>
<li>The argument is the name of a member-variable, or a local
variable (code may not compile with VC6).</li>
<li>The argument is an expression which involves the creation
of a temporary (code will not compile with Borland C++).</li>
<li>The argument is an expression involving an overloaded
function call (code compiles but the result is a garbage
value with Metroworks C++).</li>
</ol>
<h3>Don't use boost::is_convertible unless you have to</h3>
<p>Since is_convertible is implemented in terms of the sizeof
operator, it consistently gives the wrong value when used with
the Metroworks compiler, and may not compile with the Borland's
compiler (depending upon the template arguments used).</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
<!--#include virtual="/common/sidebar-common.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/common/sidebar-development.html" -->
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<div id="footer-left">
<div id="revised">
<p>Revised $Date: 2007-10-22 22:55:52 +0100 (Mon, 22 Oct 2007) $</p>
</div>
<div id="copyright">
<p>Copyright Dr John Maddock 2001.</p>
</div><!--#include virtual="/common/footer-license.html" -->
</div>
<div id="footer-right">
<!--#include virtual="/common/footer-banners.html" -->
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>