2
0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/thread.git synced 2026-01-23 06:02:14 +00:00
Files
thread/doc/overview.xml
2004-07-01 14:01:51 +00:00

203 lines
9.3 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE library PUBLIC "-//Boost//DTD BoostBook XML V1.0//EN"
"http://www.boost.org/tools/boostbook/dtd/boostbook.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % threads.entities SYSTEM "entities.xml">
%threads.entities;
]>
<section id="threads.overview" last-revision="$Date$">
<title>Overview</title>
<section id="threads.introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>
<para>&Boost.Threads; allows C++ programs to execute as multiple,
asynchronous, independent threads-of-execution. Each thread has its own
machine state including program instruction counter and registers. Programs
which execute as multiple threads are called multithreaded programs to
distinguish them from traditional single-threaded programs. The <link
linkend="threads.glossary">glossary</link> gives a more complete description
of the multithreading execution environment.</para>
<para>Multithreading provides several advantages:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Programs which would otherwise block waiting for some external
event can continue to respond if the blocking operation is placed in a
separate thread. Multithreading is usually an absolute requirement for
these programs.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Well-designed multithreaded programs may execute faster than
single-threaded programs, particularly on multiprocessor hardware.
Note, however, that poorly-designed multithreaded programs are often
slower than single-threaded programs.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Some program designs may be easier to formulate using a
multithreaded approach. After all, the real world is
asynchronous!</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist></para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Dangers</title>
<section>
<title>General considerations</title>
<para>Beyond the errors which can occur in single-threaded programs,
multithreaded programs are subject to additional errors:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para><link linkend="threads.glossary.race-condition">Race
conditions</link></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><link linkend="threads.glossary.deadlock">Deadlock</link>
(sometimes called "deadly embrace")</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><link linkend="threads.glossary.priority-failure">Priority
failures</link> (priority inversion, infinite overtaking, starvation,
etc.)</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist></para>
<para>Every multithreaded program must be designed carefully to avoid these
errors. These aren't rare or exotic failures - they are virtually guaranteed
to occur unless multithreaded code is designed to avoid them. Priority
failures are somewhat less common, but are nonetheless serious.</para>
<para>The <link linkend="threads.design">&Boost.Threads; design</link>
attempts to minimize these errors, but they will still occur unless the
programmer proactively designs to avoid them.</para>
<note>Please also see <xref linkend="threads.implementation_notes"/>
for additional, implementation-specific considerations.</note>
</section>
<section>
<title>Testing and debugging considerations</title>
<para>Multithreaded programs are non-deterministic. In other words, the
same program with the same input data may follow different execution
paths each time it is invoked. That can make testing and debugging a
nightmare:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Failures are often not repeatable.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Probe effect causes debuggers to produce very different results
from non-debug uses.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Debuggers require special support to show thread state.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Tests on a single processor system may give no indication of
serious errors which would appear on multiprocessor systems, and visa
versa. Thus test cases should include a varying number of
processors.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>For programs which create a varying number of threads according
to workload, tests which don't span the full range of possibilities
may miss serious errors.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist></para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Getting a head start</title>
<para>Although it might appear that multithreaded programs are inherently
unreliable, many reliable multithreaded programs do exist. Multithreading
techniques are known which lead to reliable programs.</para>
<para>Design patterns for reliable multithreaded programs, including the
important <emphasis>monitor</emphasis> pattern, are presented in
<emphasis>Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture Volume 2 - Patterns for
Concurrent and Networked Objects</emphasis>
&cite.SchmidtStalRohnertBuschmann;. Many important multithreading programming
considerations (independent of threading library) are discussed in
<emphasis>Programming with POSIX Threads</emphasis> &cite.Butenhof97;.</para>
<para>Doing some reading before attempting multithreaded designs will
give you a head start toward reliable multithreaded programs.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<title>C++ Standard Library usage in multithreaded programs</title>
<section>
<title>Runtime libraries</title>
<para>
<emphasis role="bold">Warning:</emphasis> Multithreaded programs such as
those using &Boost.Threads; must link to <link
linkend="threads.glossary.thread-safe">thread-safe</link> versions of
all runtime libraries used by the program, including the runtime library
for the C++ Standard Library. Failure to do so will cause <link
linkend="threads.glossary.race-condition">race conditions</link> to occur
when multiple threads simultaneously execute runtime library functions for
<code>new</code>, <code>delete</code>, or other language features which
imply shared state.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Potentially non-thread-safe functions</title>
<para>Certain C++ Standard Library functions inherited from C are
particular problems because they hold internal state between
calls:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para><code>rand</code></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><code>strtok</code></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><code>asctime</code></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><code>ctime</code></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><code>gmtime</code></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><code>localtime</code></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist></para>
<para>It is possible to write thread-safe implementations of these by
using thread specific storage (see
<classname>boost::thread_specific_ptr</classname>), and several C++
compiler vendors do just that. The technique is well-know and is explained
in &cite.Butenhof97;.</para>
<para>But at least one vendor (HP-UX) does not provide thread-safe
implementations of the above functions in their otherwise thread-safe
runtime library. Instead they provide replacement functions with
different names and arguments.</para>
<para><emphasis role="bold">Recommendation:</emphasis> For the most
portable, yet thread-safe code, use Boost replacements for the problem
functions. See the <libraryname>Boost Random Number Library</libraryname>
and <libraryname>Boost Tokenizer Library</libraryname>.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<title>Common guarantees for all &Boost.Threads; components</title>
<section>
<title>Exceptions</title>
<para>&Boost.Threads; destructors never
throw exceptions. Unless otherwise specified, other
&Boost.Threads; functions that do not have
an exception-specification may throw implementation-defined
exceptions.</para>
<para>In particular, &Boost.Threads;
reports failure to allocate storage by throwing an exception of type
<code>std::bad_alloc</code> or a class derived from
<code>std::bad_alloc</code>, failure to obtain thread resources other than
memory by throwing an exception of type
<classname>boost::thread_resource_error</classname>, and certain lock
related failures by throwing an exception of type
<classname>boost::lock_error</classname>.</para>
<para><emphasis role="bold">Rationale:</emphasis> Follows the C++ Standard
Library practice of allowing all functions except destructors or other
specified functions to throw exceptions on errors.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>NonCopyable requirement</title>
<para>&Boost.Threads; classes documented as
meeting the NonCopyable requirement disallow copy construction and copy
assignment. For the sake of exposition, the synopsis of such classes show
private derivation from <classname>boost::noncopyable</classname>. Users
should not depend on this derivation, however, as implementations are free
to meet the NonCopyable requirement in other ways.</para>
</section>
</section>
</section>