Which messes up testing. `include_paths.cpp` depends on `quickbook.cpp`
which depends on `program_options`. These kind of problems are mainly
with the use of globals, so I'll need to sort that out sooner or later.
After renaming file_path_to_url because it doesn't handle directories
correctly, I realised it was being used for directories in xmlbase. So
this fixes that. I didn't really want it to check the filesystem but
might have to do so. Proper fix coming up later.
Note that the test cases are really awkward so this is unlikely to
actually happen normally, but implementation is much easier if it
doesn't have to worry about these cases.
[SVN r86704]
This is based on Rene's implementation, but I used my own glob function,
and adjusted a few things since it's now always using ascii. It would be
nice to support unicode, but that would require at the very least a
normalization library, and perhaps more than that.
[SVN r86699]
Actually a subtle change, as includes and anchors could previously
contain spaces. Possibly should still alow that, although I expect it's
never used.
[SVN r86688]
Fix bug where a code block at the start of a file was not recognised.
I was actually adding this test to check that the `source_mode_unset`
mechanism in `doc_info_grammar.cpp` was working, but it ended exposing
this bug.
[SVN r85590]
There's a minor bug with escaped templates in 1.6 and I don't have time to
fix it, this will help limit its effect. As far as I'm aware no one uses
escaped templates with punctuation templates. Escaped templates are an
undocumented feature anyway.
[SVN r85285]
Doesn't work for: templates in lists or explicit list block elements
(because it detects when it's in a list based on the parser), but it is
usually at least as good as the older version.
This kind of thing would be much easier if I represented the lists in
data rather than translating them as they are parsed. Not sure if I'll
do that soon though.
[SVN r85247]
Since this is often indented, does not treat indented blocks as code
blocks. This is inconsistent for lists, so maybe indented blocks in
lists should always be code, or never be code. Or maybe it should be a
bit smarter about nested indented blocks.
[SVN r85126]
It's about to break because of a 1.6 change, but that doesn't matter because
it's an obsolete test. I've already removed it from my 1.7 development.
[SVN r84935]
