From 2bdf958663321407b0a5f69da7110fe163ce9fb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:32:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Suppress warnings by eliminating unneeded specializations of
 is_pointer_to_function<>.

[SVN r14721]
---
 .../boost/python/detail/indirect_traits.hpp   | 19 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/boost/python/detail/indirect_traits.hpp b/include/boost/python/detail/indirect_traits.hpp
index f22c270b..faabecc2 100644
--- a/include/boost/python/detail/indirect_traits.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/python/detail/indirect_traits.hpp
@@ -75,24 +75,7 @@ struct is_pointer_to_function
 template <class T>
 struct is_pointer_to_function<T*>
 {
-    BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = is_function<T>::value);
-};
-
-template <class T>
-struct is_pointer_to_function<T const*>
-{
-    BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = is_function<T>::value);
-};
-
-template <class T>
-struct is_pointer_to_function<T volatile*>
-{
-    BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = is_function<T>::value);
-};
-
-template <class T>
-struct is_pointer_to_function<T const volatile*>
-{
+    // There's no such thing as a pointer-to-cv-function, so we don't need specializations for those
     BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = is_function<T>::value);
 };