From da0b582703d2e291b8e39e24efecea6181110fa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:55:07 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fixing the fix by taking into account __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ as
 well

[SVN r52880]
---
 include/boost/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/boost/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp b/include/boost/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp
index f82e7ee..ad7922e 100644
--- a/include/boost/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/dynamic_bitset/dynamic_bitset.hpp
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ dynamic_bitset<Block, Allocator>::count() const
     using detail::dynamic_bitset_impl::access_by_blocks;
     using detail::dynamic_bitset_impl::value_to_type;
 
-#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__GNUC__, == 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ == 3)
+#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__GNUC__, == 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ == 3) && (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ == 3)
     // NOTE: Explicitly qualification of "bits_per_block"
     //       breaks compilation on gcc 4.3.3
     const bool no_padding = bits_per_block == CHAR_BIT * sizeof(Block);