diff --git a/include/boost/atomic/detail/atomic_template.hpp b/include/boost/atomic/detail/atomic_template.hpp
index cefc7bb..8c18fcd 100644
--- a/include/boost/atomic/detail/atomic_template.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/atomic/detail/atomic_template.hpp
@@ -114,10 +114,12 @@ template< typename T, typename U >
 struct classify< T U::*, false, false > { typedef void type; };
 
 
-#if defined(BOOST_INTEL) || (defined(BOOST_GCC) && (BOOST_GCC+0) < 40700)
+#if defined(BOOST_INTEL) || (defined(BOOST_GCC) && (BOOST_GCC+0) < 40700) ||\
+    (defined(BOOST_CLANG) && !defined(__apple_build_version__) && ((__clang_major__+0) * 100 + (__clang_minor__+0)) < 302) ||\
+    (defined(__clang__) && defined(__apple_build_version__) && ((__clang_major__+0) * 100 + (__clang_minor__+0)) < 402)
 // Intel compiler (at least 18.0 update 1) breaks if noexcept specification is used in defaulted function declarations:
 // error: the default constructor of "boost::atomics::atomic<T>" cannot be referenced -- it is a deleted function
-// GCC 4.6 doesn't seem to support that either.
+// GCC 4.6 doesn't seem to support that either. Clang 3.1 deduces wrong noexcept for the defaulted function and fails as well.
 #define BOOST_ATOMIC_DETAIL_DEF_NOEXCEPT_DECL
 #define BOOST_ATOMIC_DETAIL_DEF_NOEXCEPT_IMPL BOOST_NOEXCEPT
 #else